Estimation of incidence of MIS-C in Cape Town, South Africa

Background: Multisystem inflammatory syndrome is a severe manifestation of SARS-CoV-2 in children. The incidence of MIS-C after SARS-CoV-2 infection is poorly understood. There are very few cohorts describing MIS-C in Africa despite MIS-C being more common in Black children worldwide. Methods: A cohort of children with MIS-C and healthy children was recruited from May 2020 to May 2021 from the two main paediatric hospitals in Cape Town, South Africa. Clinical and demographic data were collected, and serum was tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The incidence of MIS-C was calculated using an estimation of population exposure from seroprevalence in the healthy group. Summary data, non-parametric comparisons and logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: Sixty-eight children with MIS-C were recruited with a median age of 7 years and 97 healthy children were recruited with a 30% seroprevalence. The estimated incidence of MIS-C was 22/100 000 SARS-COV-2 infections in children under 14 years old in the city at that time. Black children were over-represented in the MIS-C group (62% vs 37%, p = 0.002). The most common clinical features in MIS-C were fever (100%), tachycardia (98.5%), rash (85.3%), conjunctivitis (77.9%), abdominal pain (60.3%) and hypotension (60.3%). Median levels of haemoglobin, sodium, CRP, ferritin, cardiac (pro-BNP, trop-T) and coagulation markers (D-dimer and fibrinogen), neutrophil and white cell count were markedly deranged in MIS-C. Cardiac, pulmonary, central nervous and renal organ systems were involved in 71%, 29.4%, 27.9% and 27.9% respectively. Ninety-four point one per cent patient received intravenous immune globulin, 64.7% received methylprednisolone and 61.7% received both. ICU admission was required in 39.7% patient while 38.2% required inotropic support, 38.2% required oxygen therapy, 11.8% required invasive ventilation and 6% required peritoneal dialysis. The median hospital stay duration was 7 days with no deaths. Conclusion: The lack of reports from Southern Africa does not reflect a lack of cases of MIS-C. The clinical manifestations and outcomes of MIS-C in this region highlight the need for improved surveillance, reporting and data to inform diagnosis and treatment. Implications: To our knowledge, these are the first data on MIS-C in Africa. This shows that children in Africa are indeed presenting with MIS-C which will increase surveillance around the continent.

MIS-C at two tertiary hospitals in Cape Town, South Africa: clinical phenotype and distinguishing features from similar acute inflammatory conditions

Introduction: Distinguishing Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) associated with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) from acute, pyrexial childhood illness can be challenging. We present a case series from two tertiary centres in Cape Town, South Africa and compare the clinical phenotype of MISC with mimicking systemic inflammatory disorders. Objectives: 1. Describe the clinical characteristics of children with MIS-C in the region. 2. Compare the clinical features of children with confirmed MIS-C to those who presented during the same period with suspected MIS-C and ultimately an alternative diagnosis of inflammatory or infective conditions (inflammatory controls). Methods: Children with MIS-C admitted to the Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital (RXH) and Tygerberg Hospital (TBH) between 22 June 2020 and 5 March 2021 were recruited. At RXH only, children with suspected MIS-C with an ultimate alternate diagnosis (inflammatory controls) were also recruited. Clinical data were collected. Results: During the time period, 70 children had confirmed MIS-C and 27 suspected MIS-C cases had an alternate diagnosis including typhoid, tuberculosis, sepsis and appendicitis among others. Sixty five percent of children with MIS-C had no SARS-CoV2 contact but all had evidence of SARS-CoV2 exposure by antibody (90%) or Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) tests (14%). There was no difference in age, sex or ethnic distribution between children with MIS-C and inflammatory controls (Table 1). The most common presenting features of MIS-C were fever (100%), tachycardia (99%), rash (86%), conjunctivitis (79%), and abdominal pain (60%). Compared to inflammatory controls, the presence of tachycardia, abdominal pain and conjunctivitis resulted in 96%;93% and 91% respectively increased odds of a diagnosis of MIS-C after controlling for all other presenting features. Compared to inflammatory controls, children with MIS-C had lower platelets, sodium and albumin and higher troponin-T and pro-brain natriuretic peptide (pro-BNP) (Table 1). The median minimum ejection fraction in MIS-C was lower than inflammatory controls (52% vs 63%, p=0.048). Ninety four percent of MIS-C patients received at least one dose of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), 63% required methylprednisolone and 6% received IL-6 inhibition. Children with MIS-C were more commonly admitted to ICU compared to inflammatory controls (38% vs 12.5%, p=0.013) although there was no difference in mean hospital stay which was 8.2 days in MIS-C. There was no difference in requirement for inotropes (p=0.142) or ventilation (p=0.493). No children died. Conclusion: Distinguishing MIS-C from acute infectious or inflammatory causes of childhood fever may be challenging. The presence of conjunctivitis, tachycardia or abdominal pain associates with higher odds of MIS-C in this population. Differences in widely available blood tests like sodium, albumin and platelets may be useful to differentiate MIS-C in the acute setting.

Descriptive epidemiology of traumatic injuries during the first lockdown period of COVID-19 crisis in Iran: a multicenter study

Background: The study of alterations in the epidemiological pattern of traumatic injuries during the COVID-19 crisis can provide estimates in the planning of healthcare resources. In a prospective epidemiological study during the first 45 days of lockdown legislation in Iran and by comparing the results with previously published large population-based studies in Iran, we sought changes in the epidemiology of traumas.

COVID-19 response in low- and middle-income countries: Don't overlook the role of mobile phone communication.

Estimates of health capacities in the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic indicate that most low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are not operationally ready to manage this health emergency. Motivated by worldwide successes in other infectious disease epidemics and our experience in Sub-Saharan Africa, we support mobile phone communication to improve data collection and reporting, communication between healthcare workers, public health institutions, and patients, and the implementation of disease tracking and subsequent risk-stratified isolation measures. Programmatic action is needed for centrally coordinated reporting and communication systems facilitating mobile phones in crisis management plans for addressing the COVID-19 pandemic in LMICs. We summarize examples of worldwide mobile phone technology initiatives that have enhanced patient care and public health outcomes in previous epidemics and the current COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, we provide an overview of baseline conditions, including transparency about privacy guarantees, necessary for the successful use of mobile phones in assisting in the fight against COVID-19 spread.

Leadership and early strategic response to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic at a COVID-19 designated hospital in South Africa.

While many countries are preparing to face the COVID-19 pandemic, the reported cases in Africa remain low. With a high burden of both communicable and non-communicable disease and a resource-constrained public healthcare system, sub-Saharan Africa is preparing for the coming crisis as best it can. We describe our early response as a designated COVID-19 provincial hospital in Cape Town, South Africa (SA).While the first cases reported were related to international travel, at the time of writing there was evidence of early community spread. The SAgovernment announced a countrywide lockdown from midnight 26 March 2020 to midnight 30 April 2020 to stem the pandemic and save lives. However, many questions remain on how the COVID-19 threat will unfold in SA, given the significant informal sector overcrowding and poverty in our communities. There is no doubt that leadership and teamwork at all levels is critical in influencing outcomes.